The Tamil political action thriller Jana Nayagan, starring Vijay and directed by H. Vinoth, has become one of the most talked-about certification controversies in recent Indian cinema. The film’s struggle with the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), involving objections over religious sensitivity and depiction of armed forces, has led to multiple legal proceedings and delays in release plans.
Here is the complete timeline explaining how the controversy unfolded — and where the film stands now.
The controversy began after complaints emerged during the CBFC screening process. While the examining committee initially suggested a U/A 16+ certification with cuts, internal disagreements and additional objections resulted in the film being referred to a revising committee. The dispute quickly escalated into legal proceedings, raising wider questions about censorship, procedural transparency, and artistic freedom.
Producers submitted Jana Nayagan to the CBFC seeking certification for theatrical release.
The committee watched the film. Later, a member reportedly raised concerns that certain objections were overlooked.
The committee recommended a U/A 16+ certificate with 14 cuts and modifications.
Despite compliance with suggested cuts, the producers did not receive certification, triggering frustration.
The CBFC referred the film to a revising committee. Producers approached the Madras High Court seeking expedited certification.
Arguments were heard regarding delays and objections related to religious and military portrayal.
A single judge criticized procedural delays and directed CBFC to issue certification. A division bench stayed this order later the same day.
Producers sought relief from the Supreme Court, which declined interim intervention and directed the matter back to the High Court.
The division bench heard arguments and reserved its decision.
The division bench allowed CBFC additional time and emphasized procedural review.
CBFC forwarded the film to a revising committee for reassessment.
Producers informed the court they may withdraw the case once certification is granted.
Certification remains pending, with the revising committee review underway. The release date has not yet been announced.
The Jana Nayagan dispute highlights the growing tension between filmmakers and regulatory authorities in India. With increasing scrutiny over political and social themes in cinema, the outcome may influence future certification disputes and legal challenges involving creative content.
As of February 2026, the film is awaiting a final decision from the revising committee. Producers may withdraw legal proceedings after certification is issued, which could clear the path for an official release announcement.
Have you ever wondered why on 26th January Republic Day is celebrated? Every year on…
CHAPTER XII REPEAL AND SAVINGS Repeal and savings. 170. (1) The Indian Evidence Act, 1872…
CHAPTER XI OF IMPROPER ADMISSION AND REJECTION OF EVIDENCE No new trial for improper admission…
Judge's power to put questions or order production. 168. The Judge may, in order to…
Using, as evidence, of document production of which was refused on notice. 167. When a…
Giving, as evidence, of document called for and produced on notice. 166. When a party…
This website uses cookies.