The Tamil political action thriller Jana Nayagan, starring Vijay and directed by H. Vinoth, has become one of the most talked-about certification controversies in recent Indian cinema. The film’s struggle with the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), involving objections over religious sensitivity and depiction of armed forces, has led to multiple legal proceedings and delays in release plans.
Here is the complete timeline explaining how the controversy unfolded — and where the film stands now.
Why Jana Nayagan Is Facing Certification Issues
The controversy began after complaints emerged during the CBFC screening process. While the examining committee initially suggested a U/A 16+ certification with cuts, internal disagreements and additional objections resulted in the film being referred to a revising committee. The dispute quickly escalated into legal proceedings, raising wider questions about censorship, procedural transparency, and artistic freedom.
🗓️ Jana Nayagan CBFC Controversy: Complete Timeline
🎬 December 18, 2025 — Film Submitted for Certification
Producers submitted Jana Nayagan to the CBFC seeking certification for theatrical release.
👀 December 19, 2025 — Examining Committee Screening
The committee watched the film. Later, a member reportedly raised concerns that certain objections were overlooked.
📄 December 22, 2025 — U/A 16+ Recommendation
The committee recommended a U/A 16+ certificate with 14 cuts and modifications.
⏳ December 25, 2025 – January 5, 2026 — Certification Delay
Despite compliance with suggested cuts, the producers did not receive certification, triggering frustration.
⚖️ January 5, 2026 — High Court Petition Filed
The CBFC referred the film to a revising committee. Producers approached the Madras High Court seeking expedited certification.
🧑⚖️ January 6–7, 2026 — Court Hearings Begin
Arguments were heard regarding delays and objections related to religious and military portrayal.
📢 January 9, 2026 — Single Judge Orders Immediate Certification
A single judge criticized procedural delays and directed CBFC to issue certification. A division bench stayed this order later the same day.
🏛️ January 12–15, 2026 — Supreme Court Stage
Producers sought relief from the Supreme Court, which declined interim intervention and directed the matter back to the High Court.
🔎 January 20, 2026 — Division Bench Hearing
The division bench heard arguments and reserved its decision.
📑 January 27, 2026 — Single Judge Order Set Aside
The division bench allowed CBFC additional time and emphasized procedural review.
🎞️ Early February 2026 — Revising Committee Review
CBFC forwarded the film to a revising committee for reassessment.
📝 February 8, 2026 — Producers Plan Case Withdrawal
Producers informed the court they may withdraw the case once certification is granted.
📅 February 10, 2026 — Current Status
Certification remains pending, with the revising committee review underway. The release date has not yet been announced.
Key Legal and Industry Questions Raised
- How much authority does CBFC have in delaying certification?
- Can procedural delays impact creative freedom?
- Should courts intervene in certification timelines?
- Balancing national sensitivities with artistic expression.
Why This Controversy Matters
The Jana Nayagan dispute highlights the growing tension between filmmakers and regulatory authorities in India. With increasing scrutiny over political and social themes in cinema, the outcome may influence future certification disputes and legal challenges involving creative content.
Latest Update
As of February 2026, the film is awaiting a final decision from the revising committee. Producers may withdraw legal proceedings after certification is issued, which could clear the path for an official release announcement.