BNS - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

Section 46 in THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 – BNS

Abettor

  1. A person abets an offence, who abets either the commission of an offence, or the
    commission of an act which would be an offence, if committed by a person capable by law of
    committing an offence with the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor.
    Explanation 1.—The abetment of the illegal omission of an act may amount to an
    offence although the abettor may not himself be bound to do that act.
    Explanation 2.—To constitute the offence of abetment it is not necessary that the act
    abetted should be committed, or that the effect requisite to constitute the offence should be
    caused.
    Illustrations.
    (a) A instigates B to murder C. B refuses to do so. A is guilty of abetting B to commit
    murder.
    (b) A instigates B to murder D. B in pursuance of the instigation stabs D. D recovers
    from the wound. A is guilty of instigating B to commit murder.
    Explanation 3.—It is not necessary that the person abetted should be capable by law
    of committing an offence, or that he should have the same guilty intention or knowledge as
    that of the abettor, or any guilty intention or knowledge.

    Illustrations.
    (a) A, with a guilty intention, abets a child or a person of unsound mind to commit an
    act which would be an offence, if committed by a person capable by law of committing an
    offence, and having the same intention as A. Here A, whether the act be committed or not, is
    guilty of abetting an offence.
    (b) A, with the intention of murdering Z, instigates B, a child under seven years of age,
    to do an act which causes Z’s death. B, in consequence of the abetment, does the act in the
    absence of A and thereby causes Z’s death. Here, though B was not capable by law of
    committing an offence, A is liable to be punished in the same manner as if B had been capable
    by law of committing an offence, and had committed murder, and he is therefore subject to
    the punishment of death.
    (c) A instigates B to set fire to a dwelling-house. B, in consequence of his unsoundness
    of mind, being incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is wrong
    or contrary to law, sets fire to the house in consequence of A’s instigation. B has committed
    no offence, but A is guilty of abetting the offence of setting fire to a dwelling-house, and is
    liable to the punishment provided for that offence.
    (d) A, intending to cause a theft to be committed, instigates B to take property belonging
    to Z out of Z’s possession. A induces B to believe that the property belongs to A. B takes the
    property out of Z’s possession, in good faith, believing it to be A’s property. B, acting under
    this misconception, does not take dishonestly, and therefore does not commit theft. But A is
    guilty of abetting theft, and is liable to the same punishment as if B had committed theft.
    Explanation 4.—The abetment of an offence being an offence, the abetment of such
    an abetment is also an offence.
    Illustration.
    A instigates B to instigate C to murder Z. B accordingly instigates C to murder Z, and
    C commits that offence in consequence of B’s instigation. B is liable to be punished for his
    offence with the punishment for murder; and, as A instigated B to commit the offence, A is
    also liable to the same punishment.
    Explanation 5.—It is not necessary to the commission of the offence of abetment by
    conspiracy that the abettor should concert the offence with the person who commits it. It is
    sufficient if he engages in the conspiracy in pursuance of which the offence is committed.
    Illustration.
    A concerts with B a plan for poisoning Z. It is agreed that A shall administer the poison.
    B then explains the plan to C mentioning that a third person is to administer the poison, but
    without mentioning A’s name. C agrees to procure the poison, and procures and delivers it to
    B for the purpose of its being used in the manner explained. A administers the poison; Z dies
    in consequence. Here, though A and C have not conspired together, yet C has been engaged
    in the conspiracy in pursuance of which Z has been murdered. C has therefore committed the
    offence defined in this section and is liable to the punishment for murder.

Recent Posts

  • BSA - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Section 170 in THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023 – BSA

CHAPTER XII REPEAL AND SAVINGS Repeal and savings. 170. (1) The Indian Evidence Act, 1872…

6 months ago
  • BSA - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Section 169 in THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023 – BSA

CHAPTER XI OF IMPROPER ADMISSION AND REJECTION OF EVIDENCE No new trial for improper admission…

6 months ago
  • BSA - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Section 168 in THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023 – BSA

Judge's power to put questions or order production. 168. The Judge may, in order to…

6 months ago
  • BSA - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Section 167 in THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023 – BSA

Using, as evidence, of document production of which was refused on notice. 167. When a…

6 months ago
  • BSA - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Section 166 in THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023 – BSA

Giving, as evidence, of document called for and produced on notice. 166. When a party…

6 months ago
  • BSA - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Section 165 in THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023 – BSA

Production of documents. 165. (1) A witness summoned to produce a document shall, if it…

6 months ago

This website uses cookies.