Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies
100. When the language used applies partly to one set of existing facts, and partly to another set of existing facts, but the whole of it does not apply correctly to either, evidence may be given to show to which of the two it was meant to apply.
Illustration.
A agrees to sell to B “my land at X in the occupation of Y”. A has land at X, but not in the occupation of Y, and he has land in the occupation of Y but it is not at X. Evidence may be given of facts showing which he meant to sell.
The most important thing to understand: The Strait of Hormuz is not just an oil…
The verdict is already emerging: Two of India's most ambitious trade bets — the Chabahar…
Why this matters to every Indian: India imports nearly 90% of its crude oil. Over…
The short answer: Oil prices have already surged up to 13%. Analysts warn they could…
In short: On February 28, 2026, the US and Israel launched one of the biggest…
The Tamil political action thriller Jana Nayagan, starring Vijay and directed by H. Vinoth, has…
This website uses cookies.